Bring Your Forms. Or Start With Ours.

Import the rounding sheets and audit tools your team already uses, or start from a library of 5,000+ prebuilt tools built on DNV, federal, and state standards. Then assign the round, walk the unit, and let a failed field open its own corrective action.

The Library You Didn't Have to Build

5,000+ rounding forms and audit tools, already written against the standards you're held to.

5,000+ Prebuilt Forms and Audit Tools

Rounding forms and audit tools built on DNV standards ship with the platform, for hospitals, critical access hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, and stroke certification. Pick your facility type, pick the chapter, and the tool is already written against the requirement. Edit anything you want; nothing is locked.

Bring Your Own Forms

Your existing rounding sheets and audit tools come in as they are, questions, sections, scoring, the lot. Onboarding maps them onto the platform's structure so the form your staff already know keeps working, but its answers stop being a dead end.

Build Your Own

Create forms with configurable fields, conditional logic, required documentation prompts and scoring, or describe the form you need and let Clara build it. Adapt them as regulations change or processes shift, without rebuilding, and without waiting on anyone to configure it for you.

Schedule It and Assign It

Set any round, environment of care, infection control, leadership and so on, to recur by unit, department, shift or facility, and assign an owner. Overdue rounds escalate on their own. Every submission is timestamped and attributed, so "was this round actually walked?" has an answer.

A Failed Field Becomes Action

An answer that fails the requirement does not sit in a column. It becomes a finding, with the standard cited and the department named, and it can open its own root cause analysis and corrective action plan under a rule you wrote once.

32 chapters · 183 subsectionsThe NIAHO standard set behind the library
20+DNV hospital certification programs covered
5Facility types: hospital, critical access, psychiatric, ASC, stroke certification

Related

Answer out loud, not on a phone screen

Typing a finding on a phone in a soiled utility room is how the detail gets dropped. Every description box on the platform takes dictation, and you accept or discard the capture before a word lands in the field. The round keeps the narrative your team would otherwise have skipped.

The dictation itself is Clara's. See what she does with what you say.

A required Description field with a rich-text toolbar and an empty editor reading "Provide a detailed description", a live audio waveform across the bottom of it with discard and confirm controls, and a round microphone button above the field

Ask the standard, mid-round

The person walking the unit is rarely the person who knows what the requirement says, so the call gets deferred or guessed. Ask Clara in the panel beside the form and she answers from your organization's own policies and the standard in play, naming what she drew on. You still make the call.

A Clara side panel in which a user named Sam asks "what does compliance look like here?" and Clara returns a two-paragraph answer followed by a Sources list naming a patient safety and escalation policy and a standard reference, with a View Policy link beneath it

The pass that should not have been one

Some answers clear the field and still contradict the policy, the standard, or the last few rounds on that unit, and nobody notices until a surveyor does. Clara raises the contradiction beside the answer and names what she compared it against. Your team decides whether it becomes a finding.

What happens next is yours to define: a root cause analysis and corrective action plan can open under a rule you wrote once.

A Clara card headed "Potential inconsistency detected", explaining that a response conflicts with the escalation policy and with previous rounds on the unit, followed by a "Compared against" list naming a policy, a standard reference and previous survey rounds, and Review details and Create finding buttons

How Clara AI Enhances Rounding

Rounding is repetitive data entry that someone has to do standing up. Clara fills in what the platform already knows, takes the rest by voice, and flags the answer that should not have been a pass. Every field she fills is visible and editable before you submit.

Pre-Fills What's Known
Fills the Form as You Talk
Answers the Standards Question
Flags the Quiet Fail